John Mark Dean

6.5k citations
100 papers · 4.1k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

John Mark Dean

94 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

John Mark Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Aquatic Science 1.3k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.0k
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.2k
  • Ecology 1.7k
  • Oceanography 442
Replace M. C. Healey with:
M. C. Healey Canada
R. N. Gibson United Kingdom
Francisco J. García-Dé León Mexico
W. B. Scott United States
Joel C. Trexler United States
Mario Lepage France
William A. Dunson United States
Richard A. Cunjak Canada
William M. Tonn Canada
W. John O’Brien United States
John Mark Dean relative to M. C. Healey Canada M. C. Healey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. C. Healey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mark Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mark Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mark Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mark Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mark Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mark Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mark Dean. The network helps show where John Mark Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Mark Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mark Dean Line = papers co-authored together John Mark Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Recent Developments in Fish Otolith Research
1995361
2 1996316
3 1989247
4 1992219
5 1974187
6 1979179
7 1976118
8 1992115
9 1980115
10 1980114
11 198794
12 198192
13 196986
14 197770
15 200469
16 199060
17 199660
18 199159
19 196556
20 197755

About John Mark Dean

John Mark Dean is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Aquatic Science and Oceanography, having authored 100 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (32 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (31 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (19 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (13 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (8 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (6 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (6 papers) and Physiological and biochemical adaptations (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (1.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.2k citations), Ecology (1.7k citations) and Oceanography (442 citations). John Mark Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David H. Secor, Steven E. Campana, A.F. Holland, Jonathan M. Shenker, George W. Boehlert, Norimitsu Watabe, Charles A. Wilson, Richard G. Zingmark, F. John Vernberg and Dana G. Dunkelberger. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, Marine Biology, Journal of Parkinson s Disease and Copeia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact