John Mark Dean

6.5k citations
96 papers · 3.9k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

John Mark Dean

91 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

John Mark Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Aquatic Science 1.2k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.9k
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.0k
  • Ecology 1.6k
  • Oceanography 391
Replace M. C. Healey with:
M. C. Healey Canada
R. N. Gibson United Kingdom
Francisco J. García-Dé León Mexico
W. B. Scott United States
Gary C. Packard United States
Joel C. Trexler United States
William A. Dunson United States
W. John O’Brien United States
Mario Lepage France
Martyn C. Lucas United Kingdom
John Mark Dean relative to M. C. Healey Canada M. C. Healey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. C. Healey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mark Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mark Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mark Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mark Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mark Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mark Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mark Dean. The network helps show where John Mark Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Mark Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mark Dean Line = papers co-authored together John Mark Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Recent Developments in Fish Otolith Research
1995341
2 1996295
3 1989241
4 1992212
5 1979163
6 1974156
7 1992113
8 1976112
9 1980106
10 1980103
11 198789
12 198188
13 196980
14 197768
15 200468
16 199656
17 199154
18 198252
19 197751
20 199050

About John Mark Dean

John Mark Dean is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Aquatic Science and Neurology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (31 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (30 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (19 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (13 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (9 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (8 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (1.2k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.0k citations), Ecology (1.6k citations) and Oceanography (391 citations). John Mark Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include David H. Secor, Steven E. Campana, A.F. Holland, Jonathan M. Shenker, George W. Boehlert, Norimitsu Watabe, Charles A. Wilson, F. John Vernberg, Richard G. Zingmark and Dana G. Dunkelberger. Their work appears in journals such as Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, Marine Biology, Journal of Parkinson s Disease and Hydrobiologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact