John M. Strate

611 citations
29 papers · 417 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John M. Strate

27 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

John M. Strate
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Political Science and International Relations 279
  • Communication 67
  • Public Administration 28
  • Gender Studies 69
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
Replace Martin Elff with:
Martin Elff Germany
Gary R. Orren
Stefan Immerfall Germany
Nathan D. Woods United States
Mark J. Rozell United States
Gary Mucciaroni United States
Chandler Davidson United States
Belinda Creel Davis United States
Carol Weitzel Kohfeld United States
Justin De Benedictis-Kessner United States
John M. Strate relative to Martin Elff Germany Martin Elff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Martin Elff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Strate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Strate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Strate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Strate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Strate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Strate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Strate. The network helps show where John M. Strate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside John M. Strate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Strate Line = papers co-authored together John M. Strate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989167
2 200648
3 199537
4 199632
5 200426
6 198123
7 199316
8 202010
9 20057
10 20107
11 20036
12 19955
13 19864
14 19974
15 20043
16 19933
17 20013
18 20013
19 19952
20 19852

About John M. Strate

John M. Strate is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics and Gender Studies, having authored 29 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (4 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (3 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), School Choice and Performance (2 papers) and Policy Transfer and Learning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (279 citations), Communication (67 citations), Public Administration (28 citations), Gender Studies (69 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations). John M. Strate has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Arab Emirates and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Charles D. Elder, Thomas B. Jankowski, Richard C. Elling, Marjorie Sarbaugh‐Thompson, Harold L. Wolman, Lyke Thompson, John C. Campbell, Marvin Zalman, Stanley M. Caress and Kelly LeRoux. Their work appears in journals such as Public Integrity, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, Political Science Quarterly, Contemporary Arab Affairs and Political Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact