Contemporary Arab Affairs

320 papers and 839 indexed citations i.

About

The 320 papers published in Contemporary Arab Affairs in the last decades have received a total of 839 indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Arab Affairs usually cover Sociology and Political Science (217 papers), Political Science and International Relations (145 papers) and Education (20 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (84 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (66 papers) and Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Arab Affairs are Sārī Ḥanafī, Stuti Saxena, Mohammed Nuruzzaman, Madawi Al‐Rasheed, Roger Owen, Benjamin K. Sovacool, Malavika Jain Bambawale, Omar Abdel‐Razek, A. B. Zahlan and Seung-Ah Lee.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Arab Affairs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Arab Affairs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Arab Affairs.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Arab Affairs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Arab Affairs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Arab Affairs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Arab Affairs more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025