John M. Stein

19 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers

John M. Stein
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Rehabilitation 72
  • Cell Biology 125
  • Physiology 109
  • Emergency Medicine 35
  • Epidemiology 129
Replace Christopher M. Royer with:
Christopher M. Royer United States
C. D. Reimers Germany
Hiromitsu Orima Japan
Neil Edward Hill United Kingdom
Rinske van Koningsveld Netherlands
Sylvie Ughetto France
Maurice W. Meyer United States
C. P. Bredin Ireland
Marcos RG de Freitas Brazil
Maria Francesca Loreto Italy
John M. Stein relative to Christopher M. Royer United States Christopher M. Royer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Christopher M. Royer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Stein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Stein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Stein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Stein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Stein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Stein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Stein. The network helps show where John M. Stein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Stein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Stein Line = papers co-authored together John M. Stein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1962366
2 198870
3 197257
4 198725
5 197323
6 196516
7 201613
8 198210
9 19896
10 20216
11 20146
12 19796
13 19766
14 19775
15 19844
16 20172
17 19892
18 19852
19 19811
20 19990

About John M. Stein

John M. Stein is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology and Dermatology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (2 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (2 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (2 papers) and Rabies epidemiology and control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (72 citations), Cell Biology (125 citations), Physiology (109 citations), Emergency Medicine (35 citations) and Epidemiology (129 citations). John M. Stein has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Helen A. Padykula, Robert B. Lindberg, HAROLD M. BRUCK, Gerard B. Nash, Stanley Μ. Levenson, Chien-Hsing Meng, Barbara A. Barlow, Erving F. Geever, Robert Allen Berg and Martin R. LeBlanc. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Annals of Emergency Medicine, JAMA and Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact