John M. Clancy

12 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

John M. Clancy
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Pharmacology 75
  • Organic Chemistry 116
  • Biochemistry 19
  • Pharmaceutical Science 14
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 31
Replace Jorge Heredia‐Moya with:
Jorge Heredia‐Moya Ecuador
Krzysztof Walczyński Poland
Fadia Najjar Lebanon
Dorota Żelaszczyk Poland
Angela Di Capua Italy
Ethiraj Kannatt Radhakrishnan India
Yu. A. Kim Russia
Anu Mittal India
A. Bolasco Italy
Tzenge‐Lien Shih Taiwan
John M. Clancy relative to Jorge Heredia‐Moya Ecuador Jorge Heredia‐Moya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Jorge Heredia‐Moya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Clancy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Clancy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Clancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Clancy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Clancy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Clancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Clancy. The network helps show where John M. Clancy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside John M. Clancy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Clancy Line = papers co-authored together John M. Clancy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2008103
2 200777
3 200232
4 200629
5 200924
6 200822
7 200120
8 200312
9 200610
10 200710
11 200410
12 20059

About John M. Clancy

John M. Clancy is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (3 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (3 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (3 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (75 citations), Organic Chemistry (116 citations), Biochemistry (19 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (14 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (31 citations). John M. Clancy has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Canada and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include John F. Gilmer, Ana Luı́sa Simplı́cio, Andrew McVicar, Michael Jones, Pedro M. Matias, Michael A. Murphy, Carlos Medina, Helen Sheridan, Sheila A. Ryder and Maria José Santos-Martínez. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and International Journal of Pharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact