John M. Candy

1.1k citations
34 papers · 987 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

John M. Candy

31 papers receiving 908 citations

Peers

John M. Candy
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 260
  • Pharmacology 167
  • Neurology 142
  • Physiology 205
  • Neurology 47
Replace G. F. Hebenstreit with:
G. F. Hebenstreit Germany
LuGuang Luo United States
Hirohisa Ishimaru Japan
Tomio Segawa Japan
John R. Fawcett United States
Kimberly L. Panizzon United States
Tatiana Adasme Chile
Cristina Martins-Silva Brazil
Martha Catalina Rivera-Cervantes Mexico
Mauno M. Airaksinen Finland
John M. Candy relative to G. F. Hebenstreit Germany G. F. Hebenstreit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
G. F. Hebenstreit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Candy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Candy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Candy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Candy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Candy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Candy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Candy. The network helps show where John M. Candy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Candy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Candy Line = papers co-authored together John M. Candy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986176
2 199278
3 199571
4 199170
5 198864
6 198650
7 198750
8 198540
9 198639
10 198832
11 199431
12 199530
13 199229
14 198726
15 198726
16 199224
17 198120
18 198719
19 198618
20 198718

About John M. Candy

John M. Candy is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Pharmacology, Hematology and Neurology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 987 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (3 papers) and Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (260 citations), Pharmacology (167 citations), Neurology (142 citations), Physiology (205 citations) and Neurology (47 citations). John M. Candy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Elaine King Perry, Robert Henry Perry, James R. Bonham, John R. Atack, James Alexander Edwardson, Paul G. Ince, JENNIFER A. COURT, Pamela J. Shaw, Christopher John Fowler and Arthur Ernest Oakley. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Society Transactions, Brain Research, Journal of Neurochemistry, Journal of the Neurological Sciences and European Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact