John M. Baumann

715 citations
14 papers · 564 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John M. Baumann

14 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers

John M. Baumann
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Pharmaceutical Science 246
  • Food Science 157
  • Analytical Chemistry 71
  • Spectroscopy 91
  • Filtration and Separation 8
Replace Irene Pasquali with:
Irene Pasquali Italy
Andréanne Bouchard Netherlands
Janez Kerč Slovenia
H Nyqvist Sweden
Eero Suihko Finland
Dominique Cadé United Kingdom
Chad Dalton Canada
Chandra Vemavarapu United States
Raphael Paus Germany
Bjad K. Almutairy Saudi Arabia
John M. Baumann relative to Irene Pasquali Italy Irene Pasquali's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Irene Pasquali · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Baumann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Baumann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Baumann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Baumann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Baumann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Baumann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Baumann. The network helps show where John M. Baumann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Baumann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Baumann Line = papers co-authored together John M. Baumann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2009182
2 202169
3 201749
4 199046
5 202037
6 202033
7 201432
8 202128
9 202222
10 201417
11 202016
12 201914
13 202113
14 20236

About John M. Baumann

John M. Baumann is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Food Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Materials Chemistry and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (10 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (7 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (5 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (2 papers) and Material Dynamics and Properties (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (246 citations), Food Science (157 citations), Analytical Chemistry (71 citations), Spectroscopy (91 citations) and Filtration and Separation (8 citations). John M. Baumann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include D. Vodak, Michael M. Morgen, F. Erni, Kimberly B. Shepard, Deanna M. Mudie, John Schmitt, Aaron M. Stewart, Adam J. Smith, Christopher J. H. Porter and Peter J. Scammells. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Pharmaceutical Research, Powder Technology, AAPS PharmSciTech and Journal of Chromatography A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact