John Lyly

487 citations
10 papers · 36 · h-index 4

Impact in

  • Classics top 10%
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Narrative Theory and Analysis

Papers in

Journals
Medical Entomology and Zoology (7 papers)Oxford University Press eBooks (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

John Lyly

5 papers receiving 11 citations

Peers

John Lyly
Comparison fields: 5 of 13
  • Classics 29
  • Literature and Literary Theory 15
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 3
  • History 4
  • Language and Linguistics 2
Replace J. H. Clapham with:
J. H. Clapham United States
Abraham Cowley
Thomas Whitfield Baldwin United States
José Amador de los Ríos
Samuel C. Chew
John Arthos United States
Joseph Jacobs
Joaquín Casalduero United States
William Ringler United States
Barry Windeatt United Kingdom
John Lyly relative to J. H. Clapham United States J. H. Clapham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
J. H. Clapham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Lyly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Lyly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lyly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lyly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Lyly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lyly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lyly. The network helps show where John Lyly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside John Lyly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Lyly Line = papers co-authored together John Lyly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Euphues : the anatomy of wit ; and, Euphues and his England
200310
2
Selected Prose and Dramatic Work
19979
3
Gallathea and Midas
19695
4
Campaspe/Sappho and Phao
19914
5
Five Elizabethan Comedies
19733
6
Four tudor comedies
19843
7
The Descent of Euphues: Three Elizabethan Romance Stories
19572
8 20080
9
Euphues: The anatomy of wit. Editio princeps, 1579. Euphues and his England. Editio princeps, 1580. Collated with early subsequent editions.
20100
10 20230

About John Lyly

John Lyly is a scholar working on Classics, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Literature and Literary Theory, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 36 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance Literature and Culture (9 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (1 paper), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper), Artistic and Creative Research (1 paper) and Crustacean biology and ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (29 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (15 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (3 citations), History (4 citations) and Language and Linguistics (2 citations). Frequent co-authors include Robert W. Greene, Thomas Dekker, G. K. Hunter, David M. Bevington and Edward Arber. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology and Oxford University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact