John Loverich

751 citations
26 papers · 555 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John Loverich

25 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

John Loverich
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 239
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 206
  • Applied Mathematics 114
  • Computational Mechanics 182
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 248
Replace Dennis W. Hewett with:
Dennis W. Hewett United States
Antoine Cerfon United States
James Juno United States
Bhuvana Srinivasan United States
Nicolas Besse France
Désirée Kroner Germany
Matthias Wesenberg Germany
S. K. Trehan India
F. Schwander France
F. Califano Italy
John Loverich relative to Dennis W. Hewett United States Dennis W. Hewett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
Dennis W. Hewett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Loverich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Loverich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Loverich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Loverich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Loverich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Loverich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Loverich. The network helps show where John Loverich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside John Loverich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Loverich Line = papers co-authored together John Loverich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201593
2 200392
3 200681
4
A Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Ideal Two- Fluid Plasma Equations
201243
5 201337
6 200532
7 201427
8 201323
9 200620
10 201016
11 200915
12 201012
13 201312
14 201111
15 20147
16 20087
17 20137
18 20115
19 20035
20 20102

About John Loverich

John Loverich is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (18 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (11 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (6 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (6 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (4 papers), Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics (3 papers), Vacuum and Plasma Arcs (3 papers) and Radiation Effects in Electronics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (239 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (206 citations), Applied Mathematics (114 citations), Computational Mechanics (182 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (248 citations). John Loverich has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and China. Frequent co-authors include U. Shumlak, Ammar H. Hakim, Peter Holmes Stoltz, Madhusudhan Kundrapu, Michael Keidar, Alexey Shashurin, Kris Beckwith, David N Smithe, Elizabeth Merritt and Scott Hsu. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Journal of Computational Physics, Computer Physics Communications and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact