Ammar Hakim

1.9k citations
79 papers · 960 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Ammar Hakim

71 papers receiving 920 citations

Peers

Ammar Hakim
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 572
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 487
  • Applied Mathematics 117
  • Computational Mechanics 217
  • Computational Mathematics 4
Replace U. Shumlak with:
U. Shumlak United States
Guillaume Latu France
Takayuki Umeda Japan
K. Germaschewski United States
G. Dif‐Pradalier France
Nicolas Besse France
Naofumi Ohnishi Japan
R. G. L. Vann United Kingdom
E.J. Caramana United States
William Taitano United States
Ammar Hakim relative to U. Shumlak United States U. Shumlak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
U. Shumlak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ammar Hakim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ammar Hakim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ammar Hakim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ammar Hakim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ammar Hakim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ammar Hakim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ammar Hakim. The network helps show where Ammar Hakim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ammar Hakim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ammar Hakim Line = papers co-authored together Ammar Hakim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201793
2 200679
3 200750
4 201946
5 201741
6 201741
7 202440
8 202039
9 201739
10 202029
11 201529
12 201525
13 202024
14 201723
15 201323
16 201123
17 202021
18 202020
19 201520
20 202218

About Ammar Hakim

Ammar Hakim is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 79 papers that have together received 960 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (46 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (33 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (17 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (15 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (12 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (9 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (7 papers) and Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (572 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (487 citations), Applied Mathematics (117 citations), Computational Mechanics (217 citations) and Computational Mathematics (4 citations). Ammar Hakim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include G. W. Hammett, James Juno, U. Shumlak, John Loverich, E. L. Shi, A. Bhattacharjee, Manaure Francisquez, Jonathan Ng, Bikshandarkoil R. Srinivasan and Liang Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Journal of Plasma Physics, Journal of Computational Physics, Computer Physics Communications and Journal of Fusion Energy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact