John L. Strother

622 citations
43 papers · 494 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John L. Strother

41 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers

John L. Strother
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Cancer Research 229
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 280
  • Plant Science 304
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 32
  • Food Science 46
Replace Kuniaki Watanabe with:
Kuniaki Watanabe Japan
A. Spencer Tomb United States
Akiko Soejima Japan
Edwin B. Smith United States
Tuna Uysal Türkiye
C. Jeffrey
Gerhard Wagenitz Germany
Fabio Garbari Italy
K. H. Rechinger Austria
Benoît Loeuille Brazil
John L. Strother relative to Kuniaki Watanabe Japan Kuniaki Watanabe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kuniaki Watanabe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John L. Strother

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Strother's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Strother with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Strother more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Strother

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Strother. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Strother. The network helps show where John L. Strother may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside John L. Strother, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John L. Strother Line = papers co-authored together John L. Strother links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995164
2 197237
3 197828
4 198627
5 198326
6 197619
7 199119
8 200117
9
Systematics of Dyssodia Cavanilles (Compositae: Tageteae)
196912
10 198811
11 197010
12 197210
13 19949
14 19739
15 19899
16 19838
17
CHROMOSOME NUMBERS IN THYMOPHYLLA (COMPOSITAE: TAGETEAE)
19897
18 19897
19 19666
20 19946

About John L. Strother

John L. Strother is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cancer Research, Organic Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (18 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (15 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (13 papers), Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds (7 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (6 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (6 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (6 papers) and Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (229 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (280 citations), Plant Science (304 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (32 citations) and Food Science (46 citations). John L. Strother has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include D. J. N. Hind, Christopher S. Jeffrey, José L. Panero, Rogers McVaugh, Spencer C. H. Barrett, Stewart C. Sanderson, Alan Р. Smith, José Luís Villaseñor, Harold Robinson and Linda E. Watson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Systematic Botany, Taxon, Brittonia and Novon A Journal for Botanical Nomenclature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact