Edwin B. Smith

1.1k citations
67 papers · 714 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin B. Smith

59 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

Edwin B. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 385
  • Plant Science 469
  • Cancer Research 164
  • Genetics 145
  • Horticulture 5
Replace Timothy K. Lowrey with:
Timothy K. Lowrey United States
Loran C. Anderson United States
Donald J. Pinkava United States
John C. Semple Canada
Willard W. Payne United States
Kenton L. Chambers United States
Guy L Nesom United States
Bertil Nordenstam Sweden
C. Jeffrey
Donald W. Kyhos United States
Edwin B. Smith relative to Timothy K. Lowrey United States Timothy K. Lowrey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Timothy K. Lowrey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin B. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin B. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin B. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin B. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin B. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin B. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin B. Smith. The network helps show where Edwin B. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Edwin B. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin B. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Edwin B. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198268
2 198456
3 197552
4 199439
5 197631
6 198228
7 197027
8 197425
9 197123
10 196819
11 200318
12 198216
13 198715
14 198215
15 198114
16 198313
17 198013
18 199513
19 196613
20 198412

About Edwin B. Smith

Edwin B. Smith is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Anthropology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 714 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (22 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (19 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (12 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (11 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (9 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (385 citations), Plant Science (469 citations), Cancer Research (164 citations), Genetics (145 citations) and Horticulture (5 citations). Edwin B. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Crawford, Rebecca T. Kimball, Peter Fingesten, Robert K. Jansen, Mesfin Tadesse, Paul Zucker, C. Frankton, Melinda L. Hoffman, A.H. Sparrow and William MacDonald. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Evolution, Systematic Botany, Brittonia and American Journal of Archaeology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact