Edwin B. Smith
Impact in
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
- Plant and animal studies
- Plant Science top 5%
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Papers in
-
- Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies 21
-
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics 12
- Botanical Research and Chemistry 10
- Plant and animal studies 8
- Co-authors
- Daniel J. Crawford (20 shared papers)Rebecca T. Kimball (2 shared papers)Robert K. Jansen (1 shared paper)Mesfin Tadesse (2 shared papers)Peter Fingesten (1 shared paper)Paul A. Zucker (1 shared paper)Melinda L. Hoffman (2 shared papers)Clarence Frankton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Journal of Botany (9 papers)Evolution (6 papers)Systematic Botany (3 papers)Brittonia (14 papers)Plant Disease (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesEthiopia
In The Last Decade
Edwin B. Smith
64 papers receiving 616 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 449
- Plant Science 528
- Cancer Research 178
- Genetics 165
- Horticulture 5
Countries citing papers authored by Edwin B. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin B. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin B. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin B. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin B. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin B. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin B. Smith. The network helps show where Edwin B. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Edwin B. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 78 | |
| 2 | 1984 | 63 | |
| 3 | 1975 | 57 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 39 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 35 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 31 | |
| 7 | 1974 | 28 | |
| 8 | 1970 | 27 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 24 | |
| 10 | 1982 | 24 | |
| 11 | 1968 | 21 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 18 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 18 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 18 | |
| 17 | 1980 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1957 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 14 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 14 |
About Edwin B. Smith
Edwin B. Smith is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Anthropology and Molecular Biology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (24 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (21 papers), Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (13 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (12 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (10 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (8 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (449 citations), Plant Science (528 citations), Cancer Research (178 citations), Genetics (165 citations) and Horticulture (5 citations). Edwin B. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Crawford, Rebecca T. Kimball, Robert K. Jansen, Mesfin Tadesse, Peter Fingesten, Paul A. Zucker, Melinda L. Hoffman, Clarence Frankton, A.H. Sparrow and R. Roy Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Evolution, Systematic Botany, Brittonia and Plant Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.