John L. Oscarson

81 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

John L. Oscarson
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Filtration and Separation 437
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 339
  • Catalysis 179
  • Organic Chemistry 505
  • Spectroscopy 295
Replace J.P. Shukla with:
J.P. Shukla India
Toshihiro Tominaga Japan
János Liszi Hungary
David N. Glew Canada
A.S. Kertes Israel
Oscar D. Bonner United States
Hiroyasu Nomura Japan
Claude Treiner France
Timothy R. Rettich United States
Earl M. Woolley United States
John L. Oscarson relative to J.P. Shukla India J.P. Shukla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J.P. Shukla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John L. Oscarson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Oscarson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Oscarson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Oscarson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Oscarson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Oscarson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Oscarson. The network helps show where John L. Oscarson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John L. Oscarson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John L. Oscarson Line = papers co-authored together John L. Oscarson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980185
2 2001131
3 199876
4 199459
5 198858
6 200450
7 196843
8 199640
9 198840
10 200338
11 199237
12 198935
13 200232
14 199431
15 199731
16 199429
17 198328
18 199227
19 201026
20 198125

About John L. Oscarson

John L. Oscarson is a scholar working on Filtration and Separation, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Organic Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (33 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (30 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (29 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (21 papers), Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (19 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (14 papers), thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses (8 papers) and Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (437 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (339 citations), Catalysis (179 citations), Organic Chemistry (505 citations) and Spectroscopy (295 citations). John L. Oscarson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Reed M. Izatt, Richard L. Rowley, W. Vincent Wilding, Sue E. Gillespie, Jeppe Christensen, John Douglas Lamb, Thomas A. Knotts, Brent L. Nielsen, Blaine W. Asay and Philip R. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Thermochimica Acta, Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, Fluid Phase Equilibria, The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact