John L. Ackrill
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Papers in
- Philosophy 37
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 37
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Aristotle (3 shared papers)John W. Cooper (1 shared paper)R. Hackforth (1 shared paper)R. S. Bluck (1 shared paper)TERENCE H. IRWIN (1 shared paper)John McDowell (1 shared paper)W. K. C. Guthrie (1 shared paper)L. A. Kosman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Philosophical Review (2 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (2 papers)The Journal of Hellenic Studies (1 paper)Mind (1 paper)Noûs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John L. Ackrill
30 papers receiving 413 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Philosophy 414
- Language and Linguistics 46
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
- Theoretical Computer Science 4
- History and Philosophy of Science 22
Countries citing papers authored by John L. Ackrill
This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Ackrill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Ackrill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Ackrill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Ackrill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Ackrill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Ackrill. The network helps show where John L. Ackrill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside John L. Ackrill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Categories and De Interpretatione | 1969 | 159 |
| 2 | 1980 | 104 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1957 | 40 | |
| 5 | A new Aristotle reader | 1987 | 38 |
| 6 | 1980 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1978 | 25 | |
| 8 | Aristotle's Categories and de Interpretatione | 1975 | 24 |
| 9 | 1958 | 21 | |
| 10 | 1978 | 19 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 16 | |
| 12 | 1970 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1966 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1967 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1971 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 3 |
About John L. Ackrill
John L. Ackrill is a scholar working on Philosophy, Anthropology, Language and Linguistics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 38 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (37 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper) and Classical Studies and Philology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (414 citations), Language and Linguistics (46 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (22 citations). John L. Ackrill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Aristotle , John W. Cooper, R. Hackforth, R. S. Bluck, TERENCE H. IRWIN, John McDowell, W. K. C. Guthrie, L. A. Kosman, Julia Annas and Myles F. Burnyeat. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Philosophical Quarterly, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Mind and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.