John W. Cooper

783 citations
18 papers · 355 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John W. Cooper

17 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

John W. Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 43
  • Philosophy 89
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 24
  • Museology 17
  • Religious studies 24
Replace Robert Bringhurst with:
Robert Bringhurst Spain
Michael Ashley United States
C. Mackenzie Brown United States
Daniel Ferrer France
Anindita Ghosh India
S. Watson United States
Matthew Sharpe Australia
Pablo Romero-Fresco Spain
Josiah Royce United States
William Wright United States
John W. Cooper relative to Robert Bringhurst Spain Robert Bringhurst's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
Robert Bringhurst · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Cooper. The network helps show where John W. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside John W. Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Cooper Line = papers co-authored together John W. Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199095
2 199186
3
Panentheism--The Other God of the Philosophers: From Plato to the Present
200646
4
Body, soul, and life everlasting : Biblical anthropology and the monism-dualism debate
198940
5 197824
6 199120
7
Body, soul, and life everlasting
198913
8 19919
9 19907
10 20093
11 20132
12 20072
13 19822
14
The current body-soul debate: a case for dualistic holism
20092
15
Body-Soul Question: Can We Be Both Confessional and Reformational?
19911
16
Our Father in Heaven: Christian Faith and Inclusive Language for God
19991
17
Intellectualism and Practical Reasoning in Aristotle's Moral Philosophy
19691
18 20151

About John W. Cooper

John W. Cooper is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, History, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Urban Studies, having authored 18 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Public Spaces through Art (1 paper), Evolution and Science Education (1 paper), Art, Politics, and Modernism (1 paper), Visual Culture and Art Theory (1 paper) and Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (43 citations), Philosophy (89 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (24 citations), Museology (17 citations) and Religious studies (24 citations). John W. Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Alan Watt, Norman Bryson, J. L. Ackrill, Peter G. Dormer and Paul Hoffman. Their work appears in journals such as Leonardo, Philosophia Christi, Noûs, Zygon® and Teaching Political Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact