John Krapek
Impact in
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Climate change and permafrost
- Tree-ring climate responses
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 5
-
- Tree-ring climate responses 4
- Climate change and permafrost 3
- Co-authors
- Brian J. Buma (11 shared papers)Elizabeth E. Webb (3 shared papers)Susan M. Natali (2 shared papers)Edward A. G. Schuur (2 shared papers)Sarah M. Bisbing (4 shared papers)Gerardo Celis (1 shared paper)Catherine Johnston (1 shared paper)J. D. Schade (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research (3 papers)Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences (2 papers)Global Change Biology (1 paper)Journal of Ecology (1 paper)Diversity and Distributions (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John Krapek
15 papers receiving 435 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Atmospheric Science 252
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 54
- Soil Science 62
- Ecological Modeling 11
- Global and Planetary Change 81
Countries citing papers authored by John Krapek
This map shows the geographic impact of John Krapek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Krapek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Krapek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Krapek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Krapek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Krapek. The network helps show where John Krapek may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Krapek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 178 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 13 | Increased wintertime CO2 loss as a result of sustained tundra warming | 2016 | 2 |
| 14 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 1 |
About John Krapek
John Krapek is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Atmospheric Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (5 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Climate change and permafrost (3 papers), Forest ecology and management (3 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (2 papers) and Seedling growth and survival studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (252 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (54 citations), Soil Science (62 citations), Ecological Modeling (11 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (81 citations). John Krapek has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian J. Buma, Elizabeth E. Webb, Susan M. Natali, Edward A. G. Schuur, Sarah M. Bisbing, Gerardo Celis, Catherine Johnston, J. D. Schade, Kathryn G. Crummer and Elaine Pegoraro. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, Global Change Biology, Journal of Ecology and Diversity and Distributions.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.