John J. Sloper

3.0k citations
72 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

John J. Sloper

69 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

John J. Sloper
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 978
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 833
  • Ophthalmology 198
  • Developmental Neuroscience 88
  • Neurology 174
Replace Mark W. Dubin with:
Mark W. Dubin United States
Chantal Milleret France
A Kriss United Kingdom
Bertram R. Payne United States
Yuzo M. Chino United States
Nobel Del Mar United States
R G Boothe United States
Masao Yukie Japan
Margarete Tigges United States
K.J. Sanderson Australia
John J. Sloper relative to Mark W. Dubin United States Mark W. Dubin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Mark W. Dubin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Sloper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Sloper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Sloper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Sloper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Sloper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Sloper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Sloper. The network helps show where John J. Sloper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John J. Sloper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Sloper Line = papers co-authored together John J. Sloper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980138
2 2011130
3 1972115
4 1979107
5 1979101
6 197895
7 201486
8 198173
9 201367
10 200866
11 197965
12 197363
13 201256
14 197353
15 201749
16 198248
17 197147
18 200645
19 201244
20 198544

About John J. Sloper

John J. Sloper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Ophthalmology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (17 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (14 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (12 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (978 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (833 citations), Ophthalmology (198 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (88 citations) and Neurology (174 citations). John J. Sloper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include T.P.S. Powell, M.P. Headon, R. W. Hiorns, Peter Johnson, Catherine Suttle, Dean R. Melmoth, Simon Grant, Graham E. Holder, M. Neveu and Alison L. Finlay. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Developmental Brain Research, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact