John J. Sloper

3.0k citations
69 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

John J. Sloper

68 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

John J. Sloper
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 770
  • Ophthalmology 373
  • Developmental Neuroscience 90
  • Neurology 178
Replace Jan Ygge with:
Jan Ygge Sweden
A Kriss United Kingdom
R G Boothe United States
Yuzo M. Chino United States
Margarete Tigges United States
Chantal Milleret France
Nobel Del Mar United States
Karen Manning United States
Bertram R. Payne United States
K.J. Sanderson Australia
John J. Sloper relative to Jan Ygge Sweden Jan Ygge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Jan Ygge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Sloper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Sloper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Sloper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Sloper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Sloper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Sloper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Sloper. The network helps show where John J. Sloper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John J. Sloper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Sloper Line = papers co-authored together John J. Sloper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980125
2 2011122
3 1972107
4 197995
5 197988
6 197880
7 201480
8 200866
9 201363
10 198161
11 197961
12 197359
13 201255
14 197350
15 197147
16 201744
17 201244
18 198543
19 200641
20 198240

About John J. Sloper

John J. Sloper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Ophthalmology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (26 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (17 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (16 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (12 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (9 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers) and Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (770 citations), Ophthalmology (373 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (90 citations) and Neurology (178 citations). John J. Sloper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include T.P.S. Powell, M.P. Headon, R. W. Hiorns, Peter Johnson, Dean R. Melmoth, Catherine Suttle, Simon Grant, Graham E. Holder, M. Neveu and Alison L. Finlay. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Developmental Brain Research, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact