John J. Mitchell

519 citations
26 papers · 302 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John J. Mitchell

20 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

John J. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Clinical Psychology 114
  • Neurology 52
  • Applied Psychology 16
  • Physiology 79
  • Neurology 23
Replace Ahmed Hankir with:
Ahmed Hankir United Kingdom
Alyssa T. Brooks United States
Mia Atoui Lebanon
Marie‐Claire Gay France
Ana Santos‐Ruiz Spain
Brooke Andrew Australia
Emily Bell Canada
Kai Baumann Germany
Muhammad Hassan Majeed United States
John J. Mitchell relative to Ahmed Hankir United Kingdom Ahmed Hankir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Ahmed Hankir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Mitchell. The network helps show where John J. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John J. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together John J. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202176
2 198852
3 199946
4 202121
5 202316
6 200015
7 202213
8 202210
9
The Adolescent Predicament
197510
10
Adolescent Struggle for Selfhood and Identity
19929
11 20227
12 20226
13 20235
14
Moral dilemmas of early adolescence.
19755
15 19864
16
Moral growth during adolescence.
19752
17 20241
18 20241
19 20231
20 19961

About John J. Mitchell

John J. Mitchell is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (6 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (114 citations), Neurology (52 citations), Applied Psychology (16 citations), Physiology (79 citations) and Neurology (23 citations). John J. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Raymond J. Dolan, A. Wakeling, Daisy Fancourt, Feifei Bu, Andrew Steptoe, Jessica K. Bone, James Habgood, Russell J.M. Lane, Jeffrey A. Greenwood and Andrea Malaspina. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Affective Disorders, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, Biological Psychiatry and Value in Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact