John Hurley

109 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

John Hurley
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Research and Theory 56
  • Equine 55
  • Small Animals 191
  • Family Practice 40
  • General Health Professions 481
Replace Anna Chur‐Hansen with:
Anna Chur‐Hansen Australia
Jane Wills United Kingdom
Peter van Beukelen Netherlands
Amanda Johnson Australia
Hans‐Martin Hasselhorn Germany
Francine Nesello Melanda Brazil
Gillian Elam United Kingdom
Louise O’Brien Australia
Jayne Brown United Kingdom
Samantha Rowbotham Australia
John Hurley relative to Anna Chur‐Hansen Australia Anna Chur‐Hansen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Anna Chur‐Hansen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Hurley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hurley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hurley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hurley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hurley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hurley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hurley. The network helps show where John Hurley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Hurley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Hurley Line = papers co-authored together John Hurley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017158
2 201076
3 201771
4 202268
5 201953
6 200949
7 202049
8 201249
9 201948
10 201743
11 201840
12 202140
13 200838
14 201833
15 201632
16 201932
17 201631
18 201628
19 202026
20 202124

About John Hurley

John Hurley is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Education and Small Animals, having authored 114 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (14 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (13 papers), Helminth infection and control (12 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (10 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (9 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (9 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (7 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (56 citations), Equine (55 citations), Small Animals (191 citations), Family Practice (40 citations) and General Health Professions (481 citations). John Hurley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marie Hutchinson, Richard Lakeman, Desirée Kozlowski, Paul Linsley, Joanne Rowley, Joanna Sutherland, Andrew Cashin, Graeme Browne, Joanne Bradbury and Anne Beasley. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Veterinary Parasitology, Journal of Nursing Management, Parasites & Vectors and Australian Journal of Rural Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact