John Howse

105 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

John Howse
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Software 355
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 702
  • Artificial Intelligence 782
  • Signal Processing 255
  • Computer Networks and Communications 468
Replace Gem Stapleton with:
Gem Stapleton United Kingdom
Andrew Fish United Kingdom
José Oncina Spain
John Viega United States
Alan Smaill United Kingdom
Serdar Taşiran United States
Kozo Sugiyama Japan
Colin de la Higuera France
Nieves Rodríguez Brisaboa Spain
John Mylopoulos Canada
John Howse relative to Gem Stapleton United Kingdom Gem Stapleton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Gem Stapleton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Howse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Howse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Howse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Howse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Howse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Howse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Howse. The network helps show where John Howse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Howse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Howse Line = papers co-authored together John Howse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200296
2 200571
3 200168
4 200562
5 199953
6 200844
7 201141
8 201041
9 200239
10 199933
11 200230
12 199930
13 200530
14 200529
15 201227
16 200626
17 199925
18 201424
19 200423
20
A constraint diagram reasoning system
200323

About John Howse

John Howse is a scholar working on Software, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications and Signal Processing, having authored 107 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (54 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (36 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (29 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (28 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (19 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (18 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (14 papers) and Software Engineering Research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (355 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (702 citations), Artificial Intelligence (782 citations), Signal Processing (255 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (468 citations). John Howse has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Gem Stapleton, John Patrick Taylor, Jean Flower, Stuart Kent, Peter J. Rodgers, Andrew Fish, J. Gil, Joseph Yossi Gil, Ali Hamié and Peter Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, Lecture notes in computer science, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Software & Systems Modeling and Journal of Logic and Computation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact