Gem Stapleton

82 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Gem Stapleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Software 82
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 343
  • Signal Processing 145
  • Artificial Intelligence 330
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 27
Replace John Howse with:
John Howse United Kingdom
Andrew Fish United Kingdom
E. Koutsofios United States
S.-K. Chang United States
Kent Wittenburg United States
K.-P. Vo United States
Rafael C. Carrasco Spain
Harri Hakonen Finland
Bruno Pinaud France
Lawrence D. Bergman United States
Gem Stapleton relative to John Howse United Kingdom John Howse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
John Howse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gem Stapleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gem Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gem Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gem Stapleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gem Stapleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gem Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gem Stapleton. The network helps show where Gem Stapleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gem Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gem Stapleton Line = papers co-authored together Gem Stapleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200538
2 200435
3 201033
4 201529
5 200527
6 200726
7 200524
8 201223
9
A constraint diagram reasoning system
200320
10 201017
11 201117
12 200816
13 201715
14 200414
15 201313
16 201413
17
Incoporating negation into visual logics: a case study using Euler diagrams
200712
18 201412
19 200812
20
Does the Orientation of an Euler Diagram Affect User Comprehension
201211

About Gem Stapleton

Gem Stapleton is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Software, having authored 88 papers that have together received 610 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (49 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (23 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (17 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (14 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (14 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (12 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (10 papers) and Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (82 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (343 citations), Signal Processing (145 citations), Artificial Intelligence (330 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (27 citations). Gem Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include John Howse, Peter Rodgers, John Taylor, Jean Flower, Aidan Delaney, Leishi Zhang, Peter Chapman, Andrew Fish, Judith Masthoff and Andrew Blake. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, Journal of Logic Language and Information, Journal of Logic and Computation, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics and Information Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact