John Hamer

2.3k citations
85 papers · 1.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

John Hamer

83 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

John Hamer
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 884
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 107
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 62
  • Analytical Chemistry 119
  • Nephrology 48
Replace William Shapiro with:
William Shapiro United States
Barrie Levitt United States
Gerald A. Klassen Canada
DG McDevitt United Kingdom
W. J. Louis Australia
Thomas Thulin Sweden
T. D. V. Lawrie United Kingdom
Kohji Tamura Japan
D M Krikler United Kingdom
W P Leary South Africa
John Hamer relative to William Shapiro United States William Shapiro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
William Shapiro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Hamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hamer. The network helps show where John Hamer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Hamer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Hamer Line = papers co-authored together John Hamer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976236
2 1966112
3 196492
4 198087
5 197283
6 200780
7 196671
8 199269
9 196560
10 196944
11 197544
12 200843
13 198941
14 196839
15 197039
16 197337
17 196936
18 198535
19 196929
20 196429

About John Hamer

John Hamer is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Complementary and alternative medicine and Neurology, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (12 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (7 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (6 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (5 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (5 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (884 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (107 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (62 citations), Analytical Chemistry (119 citations) and Nephrology (48 citations). John Hamer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Bulgaria and United States. Frequent co-authors include E Sowton, G R Venning, E A Shinebourne, T R Shaw, M. R. Howard, John Fleming, G.E. Sowton, E A Shinebourne, Sven Janssen and K. I. Lie. Their work appears in journals such as Heart, The Lancet, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and European Heart Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact