John H. Williamson

81 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

John H. Williamson
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 524
  • Microbiology 124
  • Aging 33
  • Small Animals 102
  • Genetics 373
Replace Christelle Hennequet‐Antier with:
Christelle Hennequet‐Antier France
Alessio Valentini Italy
Ronald Okimoto United States
H.L. MARKS United States
Marcel Amills Spain
Dirk‐Jan de Koning Sweden
Michael J. D’Occhio Australia
Steven Schroeder United States
Alexandre Rodrigues Caetano Brazil
Martha T. Hamblin United States
John H. Williamson relative to Christelle Hennequet‐Antier France Christelle Hennequet‐Antier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Christelle Hennequet‐Antier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Williamson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Williamson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Williamson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Williamson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Williamson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Williamson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Williamson. The network helps show where John H. Williamson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John H. Williamson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John H. Williamson Line = papers co-authored together John H. Williamson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008106
2 199599
3 199891
4 198367
5 197661
6 200760
7 198051
8 199848
9 197647
10 197946
11 200639
12 197635
13 201231
14 198126
15 197326
16 197926
17 197826
18 198025
19 197024
20 200224

About John H. Williamson

John H. Williamson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 82 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows (16 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (11 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (11 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (10 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (7 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (6 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (6 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (524 citations), Microbiology (124 citations), Aging (33 citations), Small Animals (102 citations) and Genetics (373 citations). John H. Williamson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include M.W. Woolford, A.M. Day, S.J. Lacy-Hulbert, Richard N. Conner, James G. Dickson, Melvin J. Oliver, Virginia K. Walker, B. W. Geer, Ray Cursons and P. J. A. Copeman. Their work appears in journals such as Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, Biochemical Genetics, Journal of Dairy Science, Genetics and Developmental Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact