John H. Ford
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.5%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Papers in
-
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 12
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 2
- Oncology 6
- Cancer Risks and Factors 3
- Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment 2
- Co-authors
- Hervy E. Averette (13 shared papers)William T. Creasman (1 shared paper)Hugh M. Shingleton (1 shared paper)Leo D. Lagasse (1 shared paper)John A. Blessing (1 shared paper)William J. Hoskins (6 shared papers)Myron H. Lutz (3 shared papers)Robert E. Girtanner (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Gynecologic Oncology (6 papers)Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (2 papers)Cancer (2 papers)American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2 papers)International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John H. Ford
15 papers receiving 689 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 562
- Reproductive Medicine 193
- Epidemiology 251
- Oncology 109
- Surgery 114
Countries citing papers authored by John H. Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Ford. The network helps show where John H. Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside John H. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 253 | |
| 2 | 1972 | 118 | |
| 3 | 1975 | 87 | |
| 4 | 1976 | 68 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 49 | |
| 6 | 1979 | 46 | |
| 7 | 1973 | 42 | |
| 8 | 1978 | 36 | |
| 9 | 1972 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1976 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1979 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1979 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1977 | 0 |
About John H. Ford
John H. Ford is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, Epidemiology, Surgery and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 751 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (12 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (562 citations), Reproductive Medicine (193 citations), Epidemiology (251 citations), Oncology (109 citations) and Surgery (114 citations). John H. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hervy E. Averette, William T. Creasman, Hugh M. Shingleton, Leo D. Lagasse, John A. Blessing, William J. Hoskins, Myron H. Lutz, Robert E. Girtanner, H.E. Averette and Alan B. P. Ng. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Cancer, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.