John Gardner

229 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

John Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
  • Architecture 48
  • Information Systems and Management 214
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 283
  • Education 692
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 252
Replace M. Mitchell Waldrop with:
M. Mitchell Waldrop United States
Ray Bert United States
James R. Lewis United States
Michael A. Osborne United Kingdom
John Dewey Canada
R. L. French United States
Joseph D. Novak United States
Harry Collins United Kingdom
James D. Klein United States
Scott E. Page United States
John Gardner relative to M. Mitchell Waldrop United States M. Mitchell Waldrop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M. Mitchell Waldrop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Gardner. The network helps show where John Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Gardner Line = papers co-authored together John Gardner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 264 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles
2002309
2 2007272
3 2004216
4 2014206
5 2006198
6 2004134
7 1989102
8 1983100
9 198199
10 201588
11 200485
12 199079
13 198372
14 201667
15
On Moral Fiction
197866
16
The art of fiction : notes on craft for young writers
198565
17 201259
18 200752
19 200752
20 201149

About John Gardner

John Gardner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Control and Systems Engineering, Law and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 264 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics (13 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (12 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (12 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (9 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (9 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (8 papers), Medieval Literature and History (8 papers) and Legal principles and applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (48 citations), Information Systems and Management (214 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (283 citations), Education (692 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (252 citations). John Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Johnson, Bryn Holmes, Tom Bramble, Neal M. Ashkanasy, Melissa G. Mayhew, Gordon Stobart, Richard Daugherty, Patricia Broadfoot, Bohdan T. Kułakowski and J. L. Shearer. Their work appears in journals such as Robotica, Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Mechatronics and Local Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact