John Gallop

2.9k citations
167 papers · 2.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

John Gallop

159 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

John Gallop
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Condensed Matter Physics 781
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 926
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 531
  • Materials Chemistry 709
  • Biomedical Engineering 654
Replace Scott Dhuey with:
Scott Dhuey United States
Saül Vélez Spain
H. Takahashi Japan
C. Meier Germany
Yang Luo China
Saburo Tanaka Japan
Toru Ujihara Japan
Bernd Witzigmann Germany
Andrey V. Kretinin United Kingdom
Peter G. Steeneken Netherlands
John Gallop relative to Scott Dhuey United States Scott Dhuey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Scott Dhuey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Gallop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Gallop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Gallop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Gallop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Gallop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Gallop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Gallop. The network helps show where John Gallop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Gallop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Gallop Line = papers co-authored together John Gallop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 167 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018258
2 2017134
3 2017118
4 2003114
5 2008112
6 202179
7 200367
8 200862
9 200558
10 201155
11 199751
12 200344
13 197636
14 200232
15 199125
16 200525
17 197624
18 201022
19 201622
20 200321

About John Gallop

John Gallop is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 167 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (80 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (30 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (20 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (19 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (17 papers), Graphene research and applications (16 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (13 papers) and Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (781 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (926 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (531 citations), Materials Chemistry (709 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (654 citations). John Gallop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Cox, B.W. Petley, J.C. Macfarlane, L. F. Cohen, Kewen Pan, Olga Kazakova, Kostya S. Novoselov, Zhirun Hu, P. Josephs-Franks and Jiashen Li. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology, Physica C Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement and IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact