John Gallop

2.9k citations
160 papers · 2.2k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

John Gallop

155 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

John Gallop
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Condensed Matter Physics 743
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 881
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 513
  • Materials Chemistry 648
  • Biomedical Engineering 603
Replace C. Meier with:
C. Meier Germany
Saül Vélez Spain
Roberto Paiella United States
Yannick De Wilde France
Gregory A. Garrett United States
Marc Currie United States
Toru Ujihara Japan
Z. Celiński United States
Yang Luo China
Bernd Witzigmann Germany
John Gallop relative to C. Meier Germany C. Meier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
C. Meier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Gallop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Gallop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Gallop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Gallop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Gallop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Gallop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Gallop. The network helps show where John Gallop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Gallop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Gallop Line = papers co-authored together John Gallop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 160 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018253
2 2017133
3 2017116
4 2003110
5 2008108
6 202178
7 200365
8 201152
9 200552
10 199747
11 200342
12 197635
13 200232
14 199125
15 200525
16 201022
17 201622
18 200821
19 199521
20 200320

About John Gallop

John Gallop is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 160 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (77 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (28 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (20 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (18 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (16 papers), Graphene research and applications (16 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (13 papers) and Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (743 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (881 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (513 citations), Materials Chemistry (648 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (603 citations). John Gallop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Cox, J.C. Macfarlane, L. F. Cohen, B.W. Petley, Kewen Pan, P. Josephs-Franks, Zhirun Hu, Kostya S. Novoselov, Olga Kazakova and Jiashen Li. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology, Physica C Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics and IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact