John G Rees

80 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

John G Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Earth-Surface Processes 461
  • Environmental Chemistry 270
  • Atmospheric Science 476
  • Economics and Econometrics 479
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 115
Replace Klaus H. Jacob with:
Klaus H. Jacob United States
DAVID W. SCHWARTZMAN United States
Matthew J. Burke United States
Guido Bortoluzzi Italy
Peter J. Hill United States
Barbara T. Rumsby United Kingdom
Pradeep Srivastava India
Stefan M. Lüthi Netherlands
J. H. Powell United Kingdom
John G Rees relative to Klaus H. Jacob United States Klaus H. Jacob's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Klaus H. Jacob · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John G Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G Rees. The network helps show where John G Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John G Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John G Rees Line = papers co-authored together John G Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009194
2 1990144
3 1998131
4 1979114
5 1987102
6 200078
7 200971
8 202171
9 201368
10 199866
11 200766
12 198454
13 199351
14 201247
15 199946
16 200043
17
Regional growth and decline in the United States
198542
18
A formational framework for the Mercia Mudstone Group (Triassic) of England and Wales
200841
19 200739
20 200935

About John G Rees

John G Rees is a scholar working on Earth-Surface Processes, Atmospheric Science, Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Chemistry and Paleontology, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (12 papers), Geological formations and processes (10 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (8 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (7 papers), Regional Development and Policy (6 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (6 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (461 citations), Environmental Chemistry (270 citations), Atmospheric Science (476 citations), Economics and Econometrics (479 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (115 citations). John G Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Albert N. Link, Erica Schoenberger, Thomas M. Williams, Deddy Setiapermana, Antonio Barnolas, Adolfo Maestro, F. Javier Hernández‐Molina, M. A. Lovell, R. Oakey and David A. Long. Their work appears in journals such as Geological Society London Special Publications, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Papers of the Regional Science Association, Regional Studies and Progress in Human Geography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact