John G. Cottone

8 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

John G. Cottone
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 133
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 143
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 145
  • Computational Mathematics 3
  • Biological Psychiatry 10
Replace Annabel Vreeker with:
Annabel Vreeker Netherlands
Anton Grech Malta
Anna Comparelli Italy
Floortje E. Scheepers Netherlands
Haojuan Tao China
Manaan Kar Ray United Kingdom
Annchen R. Knodt United States
Huirong Zheng China
E. Lauronen Finland
Mary Woolsey United States
John G. Cottone relative to Annabel Vreeker Netherlands Annabel Vreeker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Annabel Vreeker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John G. Cottone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Cottone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Cottone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Cottone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Cottone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Cottone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Cottone. The network helps show where John G. Cottone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside John G. Cottone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John G. Cottone Line = papers co-authored together John G. Cottone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2007144
2 2008124
3 200776
4 200753
5 200636
6 200229
7 20117
8 20021

About John G. Cottone

John G. Cottone is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pharmacology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (133 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (143 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (145 citations), Computational Mathematics (3 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (10 citations). John G. Cottone has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sanjiv Kumra, Kelly Cervellione, Manzar Ashtari, Babak A. Ardekani, Rafael Art. Javier, Katherine E. Burdick, Philip R. Szeszko, Steven Chen, Joseph P. Rhinewine and Barbara Napolitano. Their work appears in journals such as Psychotherapy, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact