John Forge
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 9
- Philosophy, Science, and History 1
-
- War, Ethics, and Justification 6
- Co-authors
- Nicholas Evans (1 shared paper)Bernard Gert (1 shared paper)Heather Douglas (1 shared paper)Ian Lowe (2 shared papers)David Burch (2 shared papers)S. Myhra (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Metascience (7 papers)Science and Engineering Ethics (4 papers)Erkenntnis (3 papers)Philosophy of Science (3 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
John Forge
33 papers receiving 242 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- History and Philosophy of Science 70
- Health Informatics 7
- General Psychology 4
- Philosophy 27
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
Countries citing papers authored by John Forge
This map shows the geographic impact of John Forge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Forge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Forge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Forge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Forge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Forge. The network helps show where John Forge may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside John Forge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1979 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1980 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 6 | |
| 13 | Measurement, realism, and objectivity : essays on measurement in the social and physical sciences | 1987 | 5 |
| 14 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 3 |
About John Forge
John Forge is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (6 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper) and Science and Climate Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (70 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), General Psychology (4 citations), Philosophy (27 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations). John Forge has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Evans, Bernard Gert, Heather Douglas, Ian Lowe, David Burch and S. Myhra. Their work appears in journals such as Metascience, Science and Engineering Ethics, Erkenntnis, Philosophy of Science and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.