John Foley

53 papers receiving 2k citations

Peers

John Foley
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Urology 264
  • Nephrology 186
  • Oncology 381
  • Cell Biology 198
  • Cancer Research 118
Replace Renée van Amerongen with:
Renée van Amerongen Netherlands
Rainer Herken Germany
Isabella Saggio Italy
Boris Jerchow Germany
Donald G. McEwen United States
Wei Hsu United States
Elaine Guo Yan Chew Singapore
Lene Niemann Nejsum Denmark
Yoichi Kato Japan
Benoit St‐Jacques United States
John Foley relative to Renée van Amerongen Netherlands Renée van Amerongen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Renée van Amerongen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Foley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Foley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Foley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Foley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Foley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Foley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Foley. The network helps show where John Foley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Foley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Foley Line = papers co-authored together John Foley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008216
2 2001153
3 2010136
4 2014124
5 2019111
6 2013109
7 201289
8 199870
9 201067
10 201967
11
Differential expression of N-myc in phenotypically distinct subclones of a human neuroblastoma cell line.
199158
12 201757
13 200748
14 200346
15 201539
16 200838
17 200736
18 200628
19 201228
20 201328

About John Foley

John Foley is a scholar working on Urology, Nephrology, Oncology, Developmental Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hair Growth and Disorders (11 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (10 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (10 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (6 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (3 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (264 citations), Nephrology (186 citations), Oncology (381 citations), Cell Biology (198 citations) and Cancer Research (118 citations). John Foley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include David J. Riese, Jennifer L. Gilmore, Cheng‐Ming Chuong, Randall Bruce Widelitz, Kristy J. Wilson, William M. Philbrick, Mark A. Lemmon, John J. Wysolmerski, Kenneth P. Nephew and Barbara E. Dreyer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, Mechanisms of Development and Oncology Research Featuring Preclinical and Clinical Cancer Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact