John Flemming

1.7k citations
44 papers · 688 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

John Flemming

39 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

John Flemming
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 194
  • Economics and Econometrics 443
  • Finance 144
  • Accounting 98
  • General Decision Sciences 15
Replace James Cassing with:
James Cassing United States
Changyong Rhee Philippines
Leif Danziger Israel
Arjun Jayadev United States
Wolfgang Ochel Germany
Thomas Moutos Greece
Marc-Andreas Muendler United States
Ulf Jakobsson Sweden
Roger L. Faith United States
David E. Lebow United States
John Flemming relative to James Cassing United States James Cassing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James Cassing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Flemming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Flemming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Flemming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Flemming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Flemming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Flemming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Flemming. The network helps show where John Flemming may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Flemming, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Flemming Line = papers co-authored together John Flemming links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977179
2 199282
3 197848
4 197138
5 197333
6 199733
7 199329
8 196929
9 197725
10 199223
11 197122
12 197716
13 199114
14 197914
15 198814
16 196410
17 19759
18 19967
19 19887
20 19776

About John Flemming

John Flemming is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Finance and Accounting, having authored 44 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (11 papers), Economic theories and models (9 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (6 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (4 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (3 papers) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (194 citations), Economics and Econometrics (443 citations), Finance (144 citations), Accounting (98 citations) and General Decision Sciences (15 citations). John Flemming has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Leslie Hannah, Robert Bacon, Walter Eltis, William Diebold, M. S. Feldstein, Richard Baldwin, Jeffrey D. Sachs, Andrew Berg, Alasdair Smith and J. F. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, Economica, Economic Policy, Oxford Economic Papers and The Review of Economic Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact