John Fielden
Impact in
-
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Papers in
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 6
- Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 2
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 1
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 1
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 1
-
- Microtubule and mitosis dynamics 4
- Co-authors
- Kristijan Ramadan (6 shared papers)Marta Popović (4 shared papers)Abhay Narayan Singh (4 shared papers)Ignacio Torrecilla (4 shared papers)Román Fischer (3 shared papers)Iolanda Vendrell (3 shared papers)Raimundo Freire (3 shared papers)Annamaria Ruggiano (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature Communications (3 papers)Molecular Cell (1 paper)Autophagy (1 paper)The EMBO Journal (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
John Fielden
7 papers receiving 437 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Cell Biology 99
- Molecular Biology 382
- Oncology 110
- Aging 4
- Cancer Research 29
Countries citing papers authored by John Fielden
This map shows the geographic impact of John Fielden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Fielden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Fielden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Fielden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Fielden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Fielden. The network helps show where John Fielden may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Fielden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 194 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 51 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2026 | 0 |
About John Fielden
John Fielden is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Oncology, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (6 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (4 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (1 paper), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (1 paper) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (99 citations), Molecular Biology (382 citations), Oncology (110 citations), Aging (4 citations) and Cancer Research (29 citations). John Fielden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Kristijan Ramadan, Marta Popović, Abhay Narayan Singh, Ignacio Torrecilla, Román Fischer, Iolanda Vendrell, Raimundo Freire, Annamaria Ruggiano, Bruno Vaz and Benedikt M. Kessler. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Molecular Cell, Autophagy, The EMBO Journal and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.