John Farrow

1.3k citations
41 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

John Farrow

39 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

John Farrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Water Science and Technology 595
  • Environmental Chemistry 197
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 90
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 160
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 80
Replace Jean D. Swift with:
Jean D. Swift Australia
Ching-Ju Monica Chin Taiwan
Jan Drzymała Poland
J.K. Walters United Kingdom
Gonzalo R. Quezada Chile
L.J. Warren Australia
K.S.E. Forssberg Sweden
M. C. Fuerstenau United States
A. Uribe‐Salas Mexico
Shouci Lu China
John Farrow relative to Jean D. Swift Australia Jean D. Swift's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Jean D. Swift · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Farrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Farrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Farrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Farrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Farrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Farrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Farrow. The network helps show where John Farrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Farrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Farrow Line = papers co-authored together John Farrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199895
2 200685
3 200283
4 200877
5 200075
6 200671
7 200671
8 200062
9 199656
10 200553
11 198750
12 199636
13 200235
14 200031
15 200330
16 201230
17 199928
18 200922
19 200221
20 200516

About John Farrow

John Farrow is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Computational Mechanics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (13 papers), Coagulation and Flocculation Studies (10 papers), Mine drainage and remediation techniques (7 papers), Iron oxide chemistry and applications (6 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (4 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (4 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (4 papers) and Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (595 citations), Environmental Chemistry (197 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (90 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (160 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (80 citations). John Farrow has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Phillip Fawell, Jean D. Swift, Wilhelm van Bronswijk, Franca Jones, Alex R. Heath, Parisa A. Bahri, Gordon M. Parkinson, Mitch Loan, O. M. G. Newman and Andrew L. Rohl. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mineral Processing, AIChE Journal, Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Space Science Reviews and Chemical Engineering Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact