John Farrow

1.3k citations
40 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

John Farrow

38 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

John Farrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Water Science and Technology 553
  • Environmental Chemistry 182
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 157
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 86
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 76
Replace Jean D. Swift with:
Jean D. Swift Australia
Gonzalo R. Quezada Chile
Jan Drzymała Poland
J.K. Walters United Kingdom
L.J. Warren Australia
K.S.E. Forssberg Sweden
M. C. Fuerstenau United States
A. Uribe‐Salas Mexico
Mahshid Firouzi Australia
Przemyslaw B. Kowalczuk Poland
John Farrow relative to Jean D. Swift Australia Jean D. Swift's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Jean D. Swift · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Farrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Farrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Farrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Farrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Farrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Farrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Farrow. The network helps show where John Farrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Farrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Farrow Line = papers co-authored together John Farrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199892
2 200678
3 200275
4 200872
5 200072
6 200669
7 200668
8 200061
9 200552
10 198748
11 199647
12 200234
13 199633
14 201228
15 200327
16 199927
17 200026
18 200220
19 200920
20 200515

About John Farrow

John Farrow is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Computational Mechanics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (13 papers), Coagulation and Flocculation Studies (10 papers), Mine drainage and remediation techniques (7 papers), Iron oxide chemistry and applications (6 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (4 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (4 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (3 papers) and Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (553 citations), Environmental Chemistry (182 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (157 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (86 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (76 citations). John Farrow has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Phillip Fawell, Jean D. Swift, Franca Jones, Wilhelm van Bronswijk, Alex R. Heath, Parisa A. Bahri, Gordon M. Parkinson, Mitch Loan, O. M. G. Newman and Andrew L. Rohl. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mineral Processing, AIChE Journal, Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, Space Science Reviews and Hydrometallurgy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact