John E. Smith

1.3k citations
70 papers · 836 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Smith

52 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

John E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Philosophy 231
  • General Psychology 25
  • History and Philosophy of Science 56
  • Religious studies 26
  • Cell Biology 71
Replace David Perkins with:
David Perkins United States
Thomas Sheehan United States
Paul Lawrence Färber United States
Robert C. Evans United States
Robert C. Marsh United States
Monika Betzler Germany
R. Steven Turner Canada
Michael J. Harner United States
André Bretón France
Herbert Spencer United Kingdom
John E. Smith relative to David Perkins United States David Perkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
David Perkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Smith. The network helps show where John E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside John E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together John E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979139
2
Fungal differentiation. A contemporary synthesis.
1983103
3 196986
4 196463
5 198749
6
Time and Qualitative Time
198642
7 198442
8
A Jonathan Edwards Reader
199538
9 197922
10
Themes in American Philosophy: Purpose, Experience and Community
197021
11 200220
12
Experience and God
196820
13
America's philosophical vision
199217
14 198513
15 195113
16 196913
17 196511
18
Biosynthesis and metabolism
197610
19 196710
20 19929

About John E. Smith

John E. Smith is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Religious studies and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 70 papers that have together received 836 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (13 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (231 citations), General Psychology (25 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (56 citations), Religious studies (26 citations) and Cell Biology (71 citations). John E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Clark T. Rogerson, John Pateman, Y. H. Krikorian, D. R. Berry, Jonathan Edwards, Harry S. Stout, Pamela F. Foley, Alfred S. Sussman, Bruce W. Hartman and David M. Goldberg. Their work appears in journals such as The Monist, Religious Studies, The Journal of Philosophy, The Journal of Religion and International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact