John E. Sherwin

803 citations
27 papers · 647 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Sherwin

27 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers

John E. Sherwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Clinical Biochemistry 192
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 177
  • Genetics 95
  • Hematology 83
  • Biochemistry 53
Replace F. L. Warren with:
F. L. Warren United Kingdom
William P. Winter United States
John M. NORONHA India
Mahmoud Reza Alebouyeh Iran
Ralph E. Bernstein South Africa
Kristen K. Evans United States
S H Vincent United States
VICTOR SCHWARZ United Kingdom
A Kappas United States
Adeyinka Afolayan Nigeria
John E. Sherwin relative to F. L. Warren United Kingdom F. L. Warren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
F. L. Warren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Sherwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Sherwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Sherwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Sherwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Sherwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Sherwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Sherwin. The network helps show where John E. Sherwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Sherwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Sherwin Line = papers co-authored together John E. Sherwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998147
2 200186
3 200648
4 197945
5 200636
6 200436
7 196928
8 200027
9 200622
10 201020
11 201119
12 201118
13 197017
14 201015
15 197314
16 198412
17 197511
18 199910
19 19789
20 20198

About John E. Sherwin

John E. Sherwin is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Plant Science, Biochemistry and Genetics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (6 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (5 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (3 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (2 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers), GABA and Rice Research (2 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers) and Blood disorders and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (192 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (177 citations), Genetics (95 citations), Hematology (83 citations) and Biochemistry (53 citations). John E. Sherwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Fred Lorey, Samuel Natelson, Steven L Hillman, Donald H. Chace, George C. Cunningham, George Cunningham, David Krantz, Terrence Hallahan, William K. Purves and John W. Eastman. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Chemistry, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy and Human Mutation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact