John E. Phillips

923 citations
26 papers · 780 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Phillips

26 papers receiving 732 citations

Peers

John E. Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 513
  • Insect Science 270
  • Ecology 293
  • Genetics 228
  • Aging 14
Replace J. Meredith with:
J. Meredith Canada
M. F. Bowen United States
Richard R. Mills United States
Francine Goltzené France
Honoo Satake Japan
Alan G. Scott United Kingdom
Makio Takeda Japan
Shigemi YAGI Japan
Dietrich Bodenstein United States
Jeffrey H. Spring United States
John E. Phillips relative to J. Meredith Canada J. Meredith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J. Meredith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Phillips. The network helps show where John E. Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Phillips Line = papers co-authored together John E. Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002148
2 1992131
3 197073
4 199259
5 199146
6 199837
7 197129
8 198027
9 199023
10 198823
11 202022
12 199219
13 199618
14 199217
15 198517
16 198216
17 198114
18 197713
19 199112
20 199112

About John E. Phillips

John E. Phillips is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Insect Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 780 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (13 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (12 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (5 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers) and Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (513 citations), Insect Science (270 citations), Ecology (293 citations), Genetics (228 citations) and Aging (14 citations). John E. Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Neil Audsley, Chris McIntosh, Jon F. Harrison, Geoffrey M. Coast, David A. Schooley, Ian Orchard, Todd T. Gleeson, Calvin J.H. Wong, R. Brent Thomson and Susan Kaufman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Biology, Journal of Insect Physiology, European Journal of Biochemistry, Advances in insect physiology and Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact