John E. Parsons

102 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

John E. Parsons
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Finance 689
  • General Energy 70
  • Accounting 764
  • Soil Science 399
  • Water Science and Technology 534
Replace Yao Wang with:
Yao Wang China
Oz Sahin Australia
Kashif Abbass China
Tong Wu China
Marc Jeuland United States
Alan Krupnick United States
Sergey Paltsev United States
Juan Wang China
Ogunlade Davidson South Africa
Maximilian Auffhammer United States
John E. Parsons relative to Yao Wang China Yao Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23.5×
Yao Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Parsons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Parsons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Parsons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Parsons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Parsons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Parsons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Parsons. The network helps show where John E. Parsons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Parsons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Parsons Line = papers co-authored together John E. Parsons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999253
2 1992218
3 1998208
4 1986169
5 2000160
6 2012138
7 2010127
8 1995107
9 200799
10
The Future of Nuclear Energy in a Carbon-Constrained World
201985
11 199881
12 201270
13 200968
14 200564
15 199558
16 201957
17 198557
18 199256
19
The Future of Nuclear Power
201256
20 200954

About John E. Parsons

John E. Parsons is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Water Science and Technology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Soil Science and Finance, having authored 112 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (17 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (13 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (13 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (12 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (12 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (11 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (8 papers) and Irrigation Practices and Water Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (689 citations), General Energy (70 citations), Accounting (764 citations), Soil Science (399 citations) and Water Science and Technology (534 citations). John E. Parsons has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include António S. Mello, J. W. Gilliam, Rafael Muñoz‐Carpena, Paul L. Joskow, Jacopo Buongiorno, David A. Petti, Howard J. Herzog, Alexander J. Triantis, Dale Nordenberg and John S. Spika. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, The Journal of Finance, The Energy Journal, Energy Policy and Journal of Financial Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact