John E. Lynch

47 papers receiving 974 citations

Peers

John E. Lynch
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Molecular Medicine 287
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 48
  • Pharmacology 307
  • Small Animals 116
  • Parasitology 57
Replace Roy Cleeland with:
Roy Cleeland United States
Collin D. Freeman United States
C. E. Nord Sweden
PAMELA M. WATERWORTH United Kingdom
Alasdair M. Geddes United Kingdom
J D MacLowry United States
R. Peter Mouton Netherlands
George H. Foulds United States
LAWRENCE P. GARROD United Kingdom
E. Yourassowsky Belgium
John E. Lynch relative to Roy Cleeland United States Roy Cleeland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Roy Cleeland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Lynch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Lynch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Lynch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Lynch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Lynch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Lynch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Lynch. The network helps show where John E. Lynch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Lynch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Lynch Line = papers co-authored together John E. Lynch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978339
2 198696
3 196674
4 196940
5 200738
6
Tinidazole, a new antiprotozoal agent: Effect on Trichomonas and other protozoa.
196937
7 196736
8 200334
9 197533
10 197229
11 196826
12 200924
13 200824
14 201123
15 200222
16 200622
17 197421
18 197720
19 197617
20 197016

About John E. Lynch

John E. Lynch is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Organic Chemistry and Pharmacology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (7 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (7 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (7 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (6 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (4 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (3 papers), Helminth infection and control (3 papers) and Muscle and Compartmental Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (287 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (48 citations), Pharmacology (307 citations), Small Animals (116 citations) and Parasitology (57 citations). John E. Lynch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Arthur R. English, James A. Retsema, Wayne E. Barth, Harold L. Howes, Mark K. Hinders, Alan R. Hargens, Agnès Girard, Lloyd H. Conover, James W. McFarland and JAMES A. FAIELLA. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Parasitology, Poultry Science and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact