John E. Lynch

49 papers receiving 903 citations

Peers

John E. Lynch
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Molecular Medicine 259
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 45
  • Pharmacology 281
  • Small Animals 97
  • Microbiology 47
Replace Roy Cleeland with:
Roy Cleeland United States
Collin D. Freeman United States
Kenneth Lawrence United States
E. Yourassowsky Belgium
Keiichi Mikasa Japan
L. B. Guze United States
Maria Teresa Mascellino Italy
A. M. Geddes United Kingdom
L. P. Garrod United Kingdom
Melinda K. Lacy United States
John E. Lynch relative to Roy Cleeland United States Roy Cleeland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Roy Cleeland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Lynch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Lynch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Lynch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Lynch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Lynch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Lynch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Lynch. The network helps show where John E. Lynch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Lynch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Lynch Line = papers co-authored together John E. Lynch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978311
2 198693
3 196657
4 200737
5
Tinidazole, a new antiprotozoal agent: Effect on Trichomonas and other protozoa.
196935
6 196933
7 197531
8 196730
9 200329
10 200924
11 197223
12 201121
13 196820
14 197720
15 197420
16 200219
17 200819
18 200617
19 198615
20 197613

About John E. Lynch

John E. Lynch is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Animal Science and Zoology, Surgery, Pharmacology and Molecular Medicine, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (7 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (7 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (7 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (6 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (4 papers), Muscle and Compartmental Disorders (3 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (3 papers) and Helminth infection and control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (259 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (45 citations), Pharmacology (281 citations), Small Animals (97 citations) and Microbiology (47 citations). John E. Lynch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include A. R. English, James A. Retsema, Wayne E. Barth, Harold L. Howes, Mark K. Hinders, Alan R. Hargens, Agnès Girard, J. A. Faiella, James W. McFarland and L. H. Conover. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Journal of Parasitology, Poultry Science and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact