John E. Linley

2.5k citations
34 papers · 2.1k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Linley

34 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

John E. Linley
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Sensory Systems 359
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 580
  • Physiology 731
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 241
Replace Niels Eijkelkamp with:
Niels Eijkelkamp Netherlands
Sean P. Marrelli United States
Raimund I. Herzog United States
Diego Álvarez de la Rosa Spain
Ramin Raouf United Kingdom
Rainer Viktor Haberberger Germany
Sacha A. Malin United States
John Malysz United States
Annabelle Réaux‐Le Goazigo France
Burkhard Schütz Germany
John E. Linley relative to Niels Eijkelkamp Netherlands Niels Eijkelkamp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Niels Eijkelkamp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Linley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Linley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Linley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Linley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Linley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Linley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Linley. The network helps show where John E. Linley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Linley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Linley Line = papers co-authored together John E. Linley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012289
2 2010255
3 1987223
4 2013198
5 2012143
6 2010111
7 2008107
8 201286
9 201082
10 201369
11 201861
12 201155
13 201353
14 200746
15 201941
16 201136
17 201335
18 201331
19 201327
20 201525

About John E. Linley

John E. Linley is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Sensory Systems and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (21 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (5 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (359 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (580 citations), Physiology (731 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (241 citations). John E. Linley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nikita Gamper, Lezanne Ooi, Niels Eijkelkamp, Michael S. Minett, Kirstin E. Rose, François Rugiero, Robert Werdehausen, Roman Cregg, S. Parsons and R. G. Gosling. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, Brain, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact