John E. Leet

2.1k citations
56 papers · 1.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Leet

56 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

John E. Leet
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Pharmacology 610
  • Biotechnology 283
  • Microbiology 22
  • Organic Chemistry 759
  • Toxicology 81
Replace Midori A. Arai with:
Midori A. Arai Japan
Mohindar S. Puar United States
Masayoshi Tsubuki Japan
Masakazu Uramoto Japan
Gui‐Hua Tang China
Gino Salituro United States
Shigehiro Takase Japan
Mark F. Bean United States
Toyokazu Kishi Japan
Miguel Cardá Spain
John E. Leet relative to Midori A. Arai Japan Midori A. Arai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Midori A. Arai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Leet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Leet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Leet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Leet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Leet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Leet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Leet. The network helps show where John E. Leet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Leet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Leet Line = papers co-authored together John E. Leet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991145
2 1992136
3 2003102
4 199388
5 199584
6 200375
7 201168
8 200654
9 200253
10 199648
11 199648
12 199644
13 199043
14 201138
15 198738
16 199035
17 199335
18 200035
19 199335
20 200932

About John E. Leet

John E. Leet is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Spectroscopy and Pharmacology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (13 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Hepatitis C virus research (5 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (5 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (4 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (4 papers), Cyclization and Aryne Chemistry (3 papers) and Hepatitis B Virus Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (610 citations), Biotechnology (283 citations), Microbiology (22 citations), Organic Chemistry (759 citations) and Toxicology (81 citations). John E. Leet has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Stella Huang, Daniel R. Schroeder, James A. Matson, Steven E. Klohr, Kin S. Lam, Jerzy Golik, Kimberly L. Colson, Terrence W. Doyle, Sandra J. Hofstead and Cherry L. Herald. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, The Journal of Antibiotics, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Drug Metabolism and Disposition and SLAS DISCOVERY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact