John E. Going

552 citations
19 papers · 486 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Going

19 papers receiving 441 citations

Peers

John E. Going
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 239
  • Chemical Health and Safety 20
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 224
  • Aerospace Engineering 440
  • General Materials Science 29
Replace Kris Chatrathi with:
Kris Chatrathi United States
Wolfgang Bartknecht Switzerland
G.A. Lunn United Kingdom
Zongling Zhang China
Dieter Gabel Germany
Yajie Bu China
M.M. van der Voort Netherlands
Jan Roar Bakke Norway
M.G. Zabetakis United States
Mohammed J. Ajrash Australia
John E. Going relative to Kris Chatrathi United States Kris Chatrathi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Kris Chatrathi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Going

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Going's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Going with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Going more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Going

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Going. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Going. The network helps show where John E. Going may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside John E. Going, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Going Line = papers co-authored together John E. Going links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2000120
2 201549
3 200144
4 200036
5 200234
6 200733
7 200128
8 200527
9 201724
10 199922
11 200417
12 201211
13 200610
14 20137
15
Scaling of dust explosion inerting
19986
16 20036
17 19965
18 20135
19 20132

About John E. Going

John E. Going is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Civil and Structural Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and General Materials Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and Detonation Processes (18 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (14 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (5 papers), Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (5 papers), Engineering and Material Science Research (4 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (3 papers), Chemical Safety and Risk Management (2 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (239 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (20 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (224 citations), Aerospace Engineering (440 citations) and General Materials Science (29 citations). John E. Going has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kris Chatrathi, Kenneth L. Cashdollar, Jérôme Taveau, Ashok G. Dastidar, Paul Amyotte, Eric S. Weiss, D. J. Frurip, B. Keith Harrison, Simone Hochgreb and Saul Lemkowitz. Their work appears in journals such as Process Safety Progress, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Fuel, Procedia Engineering and DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact