J.K. Thomas

793 citations
36 papers · 547 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

J.K. Thomas

30 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers

J.K. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Aerospace Engineering 373
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 105
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 108
  • Materials Chemistry 362
  • Inorganic Chemistry 78
Replace Kyle Gamble with:
Kyle Gamble United States
P. Hofmann Germany
R. Dubourg France
J.J. Carbajo United States
P. von der Hardt Germany
L.J. Ott United States
Yu Maruyama Japan
T. Haste France
P. Mohanakrishnan India
L. Carénini France
J.K. Thomas relative to Kyle Gamble United States Kyle Gamble's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Kyle Gamble · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.K. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.K. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.K. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.K. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.K. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.K. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.K. Thomas. The network helps show where J.K. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside J.K. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.K. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together J.K. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990119
2 199083
3 199082
4 199063
5 200543
6 201420
7 201313
8 201813
9 198612
10 201812
11 201511
12 201410
13 20179
14 20137
15 19936
16 20235
17 19905
18 20124
19 20074
20 20203

About J.K. Thomas

J.K. Thomas is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 36 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and Detonation Processes (17 papers), Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (11 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (10 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (8 papers), Engineering and Material Science Research (8 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (6 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (5 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (373 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (105 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (108 citations), Materials Chemistry (362 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (78 citations). J.K. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include K.L. Peddicord, S.L. Hayes, Quentin A. Baker, Craig Eastwood, David J. Senor, Simon Jallais, John E. Going, John L. Woodward, James W. Wesevich and Wesley E. Bolch. Their work appears in journals such as Process Safety Progress, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Progress in Nuclear Energy and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact