John E. Deeming

1.3k citations
6 papers · 452 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Journal of Forestry (1 paper)Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (1 paper)Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

John E. Deeming

5 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

John E. Deeming
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Global and Planetary Change 407
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 106
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 69
  • Ecology 156
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 60
Replace B. D. Lawson with:
B. D. Lawson Canada
C. B. Edminster United States
Giovanni Bovio Italy
C. Phillip Weatherspoon United States
P. Pérez‐Gorostiaga Spain
George M. Byram United States
J.C. Valette France
Cordy Tymstra Canada
Clinton S. Wright United States
Chris S. Eastaugh Austria
John E. Deeming relative to B. D. Lawson Canada B. D. Lawson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
B. D. Lawson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Deeming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Deeming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Deeming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Deeming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Deeming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Deeming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Deeming. The network helps show where John E. Deeming may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside John E. Deeming, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Deeming Line = papers co-authored together John E. Deeming links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 1974243
2 1972120
3
Measuring and interpreting fire behavior for correlation with fire effects.
198060
4 197527
5
Fire Danger Rating: The next 20 Years
19871
6
Replication of Pine Needle Fuel Beds
19711

About John E. Deeming

John E. Deeming is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Global and Planetary Change, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Materials Chemistry and Infectious Diseases, having authored 6 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fire dynamics and safety research (4 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (1 paper), Nuclear Materials and Properties (1 paper), Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper) and Fire Detection and Safety Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (407 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (106 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (69 citations), Ecology (156 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (60 citations). Frequent co-authors include Richard C. Rothermel and James K. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Forestry, Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) and Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact