John E. Byrd
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Family Practice top 5%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
Papers in
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 3
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 1
-
- Medication Adherence and Compliance 1
- Co-authors
- Betsy Lynn Sleath (3 shared papers)Alan Lee Robin (3 shared papers)DAVID W. COVERT (3 shared papers)Gail Tudor (3 shared papers)Bonnie L. Svarstad (1 shared paper)Dale B. Christensen (1 shared paper)Mary Tork Roth (1 shared paper)Troy K. Trygstad (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American journal of geriatric pharmacotherapy (2 papers)Journal of the American Pharmacists Association (1 paper)Ophthalmology (1 paper)International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John E. Byrd
6 papers receiving 351 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Ophthalmology 208
- Family Practice 31
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 51
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 5
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 46
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Byrd
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Byrd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Byrd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Byrd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Byrd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Byrd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Byrd. The network helps show where John E. Byrd may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside John E. Byrd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 213 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 51 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 6 | Missouri's experiment to increase quality--and decrease costs. | 2006 | 2 |
About John E. Byrd
John E. Byrd is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Surgery and Insect Science, having authored 6 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper), Medication Adherence and Compliance (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (208 citations), Family Practice (31 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (51 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (5 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (46 citations). John E. Byrd has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Betsy Lynn Sleath, Alan Lee Robin, DAVID W. COVERT, Gail Tudor, Bonnie L. Svarstad, Dale B. Christensen, Mary Tork Roth, Troy K. Trygstad, Ariane K. Kawata and Robert F. DeVellis. Their work appears in journals such as The American journal of geriatric pharmacotherapy, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Ophthalmology, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.