John E. Black

1.1k citations
30 papers · 863 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Black

30 papers receiving 808 citations

Peers

John E. Black
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 534
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 113
  • Developmental Biology 23
  • Atmospheric Science 148
  • Geophysics 90
Replace William T. Doyle with:
William T. Doyle United States
I. L. F. Ray Germany
B.J. Luff United Kingdom
M.B. Lewis United States
K. T. Moore United States
M. C. Lavine United States
Steven W. Novak United States
Eugenie Kirk Switzerland
C.P. Swann United States
Robert E. Peale United States
John E. Black relative to William T. Doyle United States William T. Doyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
William T. Doyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Black

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Black's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Black with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Black more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Black

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Black. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Black. The network helps show where John E. Black may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside John E. Black, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Black Line = papers co-authored together John E. Black links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003114
2 198498
3 198881
4 198267
5 198161
6 198555
7 198248
8 198043
9 198133
10 197831
11 199729
12 198128
13 198718
14 199318
15 198617
16 198417
17 198114
18 198014
19 199212
20 20039

About John E. Black

John E. Black is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Atmospheric Science, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 863 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (15 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (10 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (8 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (5 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (4 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (3 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (534 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (113 citations), Developmental Biology (23 citations), Atmospheric Science (148 citations) and Geophysics (90 citations). John E. Black has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include D. L. Mills, Talat S. Rahman, Robert H. Diehl, Ronald P. Larkin, R. F. Wallis, D. A. Campbell, P. Bopp, S. Lehwald, H. Ibach and Jacob Szeftel. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Surface Science, The Auk, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Economic Geology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact