John de Wit
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 0.2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Infectious Diseases top 0.2%
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Papers in
-
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions 164
- Epidemiology 119
- HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk 109
- Co-authors
- Denise T. D. de Ridder (21 shared papers)Wolfgang Stroebe (12 shared papers)Emely de Vet (19 shared papers)Toby Lea (31 shared papers)Marieke A. Adriaanse (10 shared papers)F. Marijn Stok (25 shared papers)Martin Holt (55 shared papers)Natascha de Hoog (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- AIDS and Behavior (26 papers)Sexual Health (16 papers)AIDS Care (12 papers)AIDS (11 papers)Sexually Transmitted Infections (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John de Wit
284 papers receiving 7.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
- Applied Psychology 1.6k
- Infectious Diseases 3.4k
- Virology 492
- General Health Professions 2.1k
- Epidemiology 2.8k
Countries citing papers authored by John de Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of John de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John de Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John de Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John de Wit. The network helps show where John de Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 297 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 289 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 268 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 233 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 205 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 195 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 190 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 168 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 147 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 135 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 133 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 129 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 119 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 113 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 109 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 107 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 106 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 106 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 105 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 105 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 104 |
About John de Wit
John de Wit is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 297 papers that have together received 8.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (164 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (109 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (77 papers), Sex work and related issues (57 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (48 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (30 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (22 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.6k citations), Infectious Diseases (3.4k citations), Virology (492 citations), General Health Professions (2.1k citations) and Epidemiology (2.8k citations). John de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Denise T. D. de Ridder, Wolfgang Stroebe, Emely de Vet, Toby Lea, Marieke A. Adriaanse, F. Marijn Stok, Martin Holt, Natascha de Hoog, Enny Das and Robert Rеynolds. Their work appears in journals such as AIDS and Behavior, Sexual Health, AIDS Care, AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Infections.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.