John Crossley

35 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

John Crossley
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 116
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 151
  • Inorganic Chemistry 105
  • Organic Chemistry 213
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 56
Replace O. A. Osipov with:
O. A. Osipov Russia
C. Perchard France
Alfred Kolbe Germany
M. J. Aroney Australia
Reuben B. Girling United Kingdom
Gerald R. Van Hecke United States
Valdemaras Aleksa Lithuania
L. Scaramuzza Italy
A. Hargreaves United States
Tor Dahl Norway
John Crossley relative to O. A. Osipov Russia O. A. Osipov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
O. A. Osipov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Crossley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Crossley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Crossley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Crossley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Crossley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Crossley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Crossley. The network helps show where John Crossley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Crossley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Crossley Line = papers co-authored together John Crossley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199454
2 197745
3 199536
4 199634
5 199826
6 199422
7 197421
8 199621
9 197719
10 199618
11 196415
12 196915
13 197315
14 197714
15 197213
16 197212
17 196212
18 199612
19 199512
20 197112

About John Crossley

John Crossley is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (13 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (9 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (7 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (6 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (5 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers) and Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (116 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (151 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (105 citations), Organic Chemistry (213 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (56 citations). John Crossley has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include A.G. Orpen, Graham Williams, Neil G. Connelly, Saul G. Cohen, Martin S. Beevers, Charles P. Smyth, Claire J. Carmalt, Nicholas C. Norman, Antonio Martı́n and Philip Lightfoot. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Organometallics and Chemical Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact