John C.M.J. de Groot
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 0.2%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Neurology top 2%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
Papers in
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 41
- Neurology 21
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 21
- Co-authors
- Guido F. Smoorenburg (22 shared papers)Sjaak F.L. Klis (20 shared papers)E. H. Huizing (13 shared papers)Huib Versnel (8 shared papers)Martijn J.H. Agterberg (6 shared papers)J. E. Veldman (8 shared papers)Frank P.T. Hamers (8 shared papers)Jan E. Veldman (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Hearing Research (22 papers)Acta Oto-Laryngologica (4 papers)ORL (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
John C.M.J. de Groot
51 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Sensory Systems 1.1k
- Neurology 364
- Otorhinolaryngology 140
- Developmental Neuroscience 84
- Cognitive Neuroscience 397
Countries citing papers authored by John C.M.J. de Groot
This map shows the geographic impact of John C.M.J. de Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C.M.J. de Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C.M.J. de Groot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John C.M.J. de Groot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C.M.J. de Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C.M.J. de Groot. The network helps show where John C.M.J. de Groot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John C.M.J. de Groot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 128 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 104 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 100 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 83 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 76 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 75 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 70 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 68 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 66 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 58 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 55 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 54 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 50 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 49 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 44 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 38 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 36 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 32 |
About John C.M.J. de Groot
John C.M.J. de Groot is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (41 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (21 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (20 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (5 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (3 papers), Ear and Head Tumors (3 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (1.1k citations), Neurology (364 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (140 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (84 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (397 citations). John C.M.J. de Groot has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Guido F. Smoorenburg, Sjaak F.L. Klis, E. H. Huizing, Huib Versnel, Martijn J.H. Agterberg, J. E. Veldman, Frank P.T. Hamers, Jan E. Veldman, Heiko Locher and Margriet A. Huisman. Their work appears in journals such as Hearing Research, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, ORL, PLoS ONE and Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.