John Clive
Impact in
- History top 1%
- Scottish History and National Identity
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- European Political History Analysis
Papers in
- History 4
- Scottish History and National Identity 2
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 2
- Co-authors
- J. W. Burrow (1 shared paper)W. J. Reader (1 shared paper)Biancamaria Fontana (1 shared paper)Bernard Bailyn (1 shared paper)S. G. Checkland (1 shared paper)Doris S. Goldstein (1 shared paper)Bernard Semmel (2 shared papers)G. W. Bowersock (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (11 papers)History and Theory (4 papers)The William and Mary Quarterly (3 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2 papers)Political Science Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Clive
22 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- History 117
- History and Philosophy of Science 37
- Anthropology 69
- Political Science and International Relations 109
- Archeology 4
Countries citing papers authored by John Clive
This map shows the geographic impact of John Clive's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Clive with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Clive more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Clive
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Clive. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Clive. The network helps show where John Clive may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside John Clive, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1967 | 143 | |
| 2 | 1967 | 84 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 40 | |
| 4 | 1954 | 30 | |
| 5 | 1974 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1972 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1958 | 18 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1977 | 13 | |
| 11 | Thomas Babington Macaulay - the shaping of the historian | 1973 | 8 |
| 12 | 1958 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1964 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1965 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1960 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1965 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1975 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1973 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1969 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 4 |
About John Clive
John Clive is a scholar working on History, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), Political Theory and Influence (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Historical Education Studies Worldwide (1 paper), Evolution and Science Education (1 paper), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (1 paper) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (117 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (37 citations), Anthropology (69 citations), Political Science and International Relations (109 citations) and Archeology (4 citations). John Clive has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J. W. Burrow, W. J. Reader, Biancamaria Fontana, Bernard Bailyn, S. G. Checkland, Doris S. Goldstein, Bernard Semmel, G. W. Bowersock, Élie Halévy and Stephen R. Graubard. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, History and Theory, The William and Mary Quarterly, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and Political Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.