John Canfield
Impact in
- Aging top 1%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
Papers in
-
- RNA modifications and cancer 2
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 1
-
- Diet and metabolism studies 2
- Co-authors
- Clare Edwards (4 shared papers)Neil Copes (4 shared papers)Patrick C. Bradshaw (4 shared papers)Hana Totary-Jain (6 shared papers)Muhammad Rehan (2 shared papers)Jessica Brunquell (1 shared paper)Sandy D. Westerheide (1 shared paper)HE Broxmeyer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Personalized Medicine (1 paper)Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (1 paper)Blood (1 paper)BMC Genetics (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanCanada
In The Last Decade
John Canfield
11 papers receiving 766 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Aging 211
- Biological Psychiatry 32
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 58
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 56
- Physiology 194
Countries citing papers authored by John Canfield
This map shows the geographic impact of John Canfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Canfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Canfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Canfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Canfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Canfield. The network helps show where John Canfield may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Canfield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 169 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 161 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 82 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 82 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 40 | |
| 8 | D-beta-Hydroxybutyrate Extends Lifespan in | 2014 | 31 |
| 9 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 16 |
About John Canfield
John Canfield is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cancer Research, Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include MicroRNA in disease regulation (3 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1 paper), Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (1 paper) and Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (211 citations), Biological Psychiatry (32 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (58 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (56 citations) and Physiology (194 citations). John Canfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Clare Edwards, Neil Copes, Patrick C. Bradshaw, Hana Totary-Jain, Muhammad Rehan, Jessica Brunquell, Sandy D. Westerheide, HE Broxmeyer, Susanne Braun and Charlie Mantel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personalized Medicine, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, Blood, BMC Genetics and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.